Nope, it is not a comparison of various models, horsepower, top speed etc. Instead it is a question of how likely are you to buy X vehicle?
46% of the people surveyed said they would buy a Ford over a GM because they did not take a bailout.
Good news for Ford, bad news for GM
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
One man's attempt to explain it all.
Thanks for stopping by!
Please leave a comment (even anonymously) when you read a post that makes an impression on you.
Posts
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(206)
-
▼
August
(30)
- Greenpeace's Take on Ted Kennedy
- Lockerbie Bomber
- Good News!!!
- Cheating husband wears a sign
- UN wants to teach children to masturbate
- A Robber's Duh! Moment
- Microsoft's Duh! Moment
- Pot Smokers Having Trouble in Bed
- The Viagra Effect
- Texas' Finest (not)
- Military "Brats" grow up fast
- This is News?
- Army Seeks to Mentally Toughen Troops
- Gotta Love This Headline
- Girl fined for selling lemonade
- Potbellies are "in"
- Woodstock
- Michigan Prison may receive Gitmo prisoners
- Ted Nugent Defending the 2nd Amendment
- Pirates charging for expenses
- The White House: The New Gestapo?
- Lawmakers Receiving Death Threats
- Inmate hides gun in his fat
- Our Education System is Working!
- The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy Round 2
- New Look
- Grieving Mom Fined
- Ford vs. GM
- "Sin Bins" in the UK
- Cool blog I am now following
-
▼
August
(30)
About Me
- Bob
- Michigan, United States
- Husband, Father, avid reader, retired U.S. Navy
1 comment:
Long before the automaker bailout, Bill Ford knew the company needed a change, so Alan Mulally came aboard as the CEO. I applaud Mr. Ford for making the change and not letting his pride get in the way. I own a Ford and will buy another one because Ford didn't receive bailout money and also, I believe in the "Blue Oval." Now if my husband will only buy me a mustang with the "Pink Warriors" package.
Post a Comment